Why does communsim work in some developing countries and democracy in Essay

Why does communsim work in some developing countries and democracy in others - Essay ExampleIt intrudes further into the lives of people than socialism does. For example, some communist countries do not ply their citizens to practice certain religions, change jobs, or move to the town of their choice (Margonis, 1993).According to Nowotny (1997), fabianism has been perenni all in ally perceived to have been but a -- certainly disastrous -- evolutionary accident on the track of progress. Once this error would have been corrected and once the communist system was removed, the countries concerned would, without any peachy difficulties, resume their rightful place on the feed of frugal and political progress. This would occur spontaneously. Errors could stunt or thwart the development. But, on the other hand, no special measures would be necessary to promote it. Markets and with them wealth polite society and political institutions and with them democracy would install themselves w ithout further ado. Some even claimed that this step back unto the ladder of political and economic evolution would be easier (Nowotny, 1997). Although communism is always seen as the big bad animate being, there are still studies that suggest that it is much better that developing communist countries to embrace communism first before venturing into capitalism.Numerous researches argue towards the success of shifting governments from communism to democracy. McFaul (2005) cited the Serbian, Georgian, and Ukrainian cases of democratic breakthrough resemble one another-and differ from other democratic transitions or revolutions-in four critical respects. First, in all three cases, the spark for regime change was a fraudulent national election, not a war, an economic crisis, a split between ruling elites, an external shock or international factor, or the finale of a dictator. Second, the democratic challengers deployed extra-constitutional means solely to defend the existing, democra tic constitution rather than to achieve a fundamental rewriting of the rules of the political